🔗 Share this article

Market specialists have expressed deep doubt regarding bullish statements that American large firms will quickly commit tens of billions of dollars to revive the country's dilapidated energy sector.

Demand for Iron-Clad Guarantees

Lacking an “iron-clad guarantee” of full reimbursement from the US federal government, specialists predict international firms to move with significant hesitation.

“It seems too early to speculate on any future business activities,” a representative commented recently.

The aggressive schedule of less than a year and a half has been publicly suggested. Yet, expert analyses paint a longer timeline.

A Likely Timeline

“It is likely going to take three years for any kind of recovery in production,” said one chief investment officer.

Experts believe energy firms would likely spend:

• Year one: Navigating new operating agreements.
• The second year: Beginning reconstruction of facilities.
• Year three: Being able to meaningfully increase yield.

The result could be an increase of around 500,000 bpd perhaps by the end of the decade.

Interest vs. Willingness for Risk

There is a key distinction between multinationals’ interest and their appetite to invest significantly.

“I think their interest is an high score, on a scale of ten. I think their readiness is a mid-range score, because there is no clarity yet.”

Experienced observers in the region share this caution. The thinking is that companies will politically express enthusiasm while actually moving with great care.

The Enormous Cost

The monetary bill would be enormous. Independent projections suggest that adding between 500,000 and a million bpd would require more than $10 billion in capital spending over several years.

Yet, returning output to historical levels of around 2.5 million bpd could require a staggering $80 billion to $90 billion over many more years.

The Unanswered Question of Government Backing

The idea of oil giants being reimbursed by the US taxpayer has been repeatedly mentioned. But, specific plans on such a mechanism have so far not been forthcoming.

The absence of certainty is the main factor behind the sector's caution. Operators seek guarantees against political risk and the chance that a different government could cancel any agreement.

“You need to be shielded from sovereign risk, that we’ve experienced in Venezuela already.”

Ultimately, while political optimism runs strong, the operational risks suggest a path of extreme caution for any large-scale investment in the country's energy industry.